Skip to content

Join the Seedly owners community →

From the blog

Why Agencies Are Leaving WordPress in 2026

Plugin maintenance, security patches, and slow database-driven pages are pushing agencies off WordPress. Here is what they are moving to, and why.

Andrew Lee Jenkins7 min readMigrations
Why Agencies Are Leaving WordPress in 2026

I ran my agency on WordPress for years. It was the obvious default, and for a long time it was fine. In 2026 I moved my whole client portfolio off it. Not because WordPress cannot build a site, it obviously can, but because maintaining dozens of them had quietly become a tax on my business.

The plugin tax

Every client site I ran was a small pile of plugins, and every plugin is a moving part that can break, conflict, or quietly go unmaintained. Multiply that across a whole portfolio and the real cost shows up. Hours every month spent updating, testing, and un-breaking sites that were supposed to be done and paid for.

Where my month went, per 25 client sites
WordPress plugin + core updates, conflict fixes~20 hrs/mo
Static platform nothing to patch~2 hrs/mo

A static site has no plugins and no database to maintain, so the upkeep that used to scale with my client count mostly went away.

To be fair to WordPress, the raw cost was never crazy. I run my client sites on a single server that handles about a hundred of them for around $600 a month, and I pay roughly $745 a year on top of that for the premium plugin and subscription licenses. The bill was never my problem. The time was. Every one of those sites was mine to update, test, and un-break, forever.

You are not buying alone

Join the Seedly owners community.

Owners trade setups, share add-ons, and swap playbooks. See what people are building before you commit.

The security treadmill

Plugin vulnerabilities are the most common way small-business sites get compromised, and I have cleaned up the aftermath more than once. On WordPress, staying safe means staying on top of patches across every site, forever. A static site has almost no attack surface. There is no database, no plugin runtime, nothing to inject into. The safest site I can hand a client is the one with the least to exploit.

Why static beats database-driven on speed

WordPress builds pages from a database on every request, then leans on caching plugins to hide it. I got tired of babysitting a caching stack just to get a fast page. Static sites are clean HTML on a CDN, so they pass Core Web Vitals by default. Faster pages help my clients rank and convert, and I do not have to maintain anything to keep them that way.

That is the model behind Seedly Sites hosting and performance. Every client site ships as static HTML to the edge, green on Core Web Vitals out of the box.

The fastest, safest, lowest-maintenance site is the one with no database and no plugins to keep alive.

Migration without starting over

The only reason I stayed on WordPress as long as I did was the switching cost. Rebuilding a whole client portfolio by hand is a non-starter, so I built a real migration pipeline instead. It ports an existing site into the builder with a content-parity gate, remaps the internal links, and brings the media along, so I could move clients over without rebuilding from scratch.

What I moved to

I was not about to leave WordPress for another rented platform with the same lock-in. I moved to something I own - a self-hosted, white-label builder that outputs clean static sites with no plugin tax, no security treadmill, and no per-site fees. That is what I packaged as Seedly Sites. See how it stacks up in the Seedly Sites vs WordPress comparison, or try it live.

You are not buying alone.

Seedly owners trade setups and share add-ons. Join the community, or take the platform for a spin first.